Oceania & Australia - Kosciuszko
What is the 7th summit? The Debate: Kosciuszko vs. Carstensz vs. Wilhelm
The argument for Wilhelm is that all the geographical experts and atlas makers say Wilhelm is the highest point in Oceania. The continents should be decided by the geographical experts. After all, islands are included on other continents, and continental shelf/tectonic plates do not define other continents. The Seven Summits are climbing the Seven Continents, not the Seven Tectonic Plates. Besides, there aren’t even seven tectonic plates. The argument for Kosciuszko is that the continent should be the Australian landmass only. This is the old school definition. Although back in the day, it didn’t really matter so much. But then, if you believe this, are other islands included in the continents? (Great Britain, Hawaii, Catalina, Long Island etc.) The argument for Carstensz Pyramid (Puncak Jaya) is also that the islands are included, but all of the island of New Guinea should be part of Oceania. The West side of the Island is on the same tectonic plate and continental shelf of Australia. But then, if you believe this, why do you call it the Seven Summits? Because Europe and Asia are also one tectonic plate and continental shelf, and those are two continents. Should all three versions be accepted?
See what the Atlas esperts say
Definition of continent |